United Nations has convened a summit on climate change in the hope of opening some way out to the deadlock over the issue of mutual concern.Geoengineering as option of last resort, but the Royal Society asserted that some of the safer geoengineering techniques, like aggressively planting forests, could be implemented currently in conjunction with carbon reduction efforts. The group studied the safety, expense, effectiveness, and quickness of deployment for projects under two main classes of geoengineering One is carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and second solar-radiation management (SRM).
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to give much needed political momentum for negotiations on this crucial issue.The summit on climate change will be held at the UN headquarters in New York later this month on 22nd September, a top UN official told.A record number of world leaders, including the US President Barack Obama, are expected to attend the summit.
Comprehending
the need to cut the Gordian knot over global theme of climate change, the officials of the principal organisation view the involvement of leaders from across the world as a crucial."The full engagement of world leaders is absolutely essential -there are now only 50 negotiating days left before Copenhagen begins," Janos Pasztor, Director of the Secretary-General's Climate Change Support Team said.Noting Security General’s continuous urging to leaders to step up action towards "a fair, comprehensive and effective global treaty that addresses one of the most fundamental challenges the world is facing," he expressed fears on the slow moving international negotiations on the new regime.The Secretary-General's recent visit to the Arctic was a reminder that failure to take action would have serious consequences, "not just for polar bears in the Arctic, but for people on every continent and in every country," he observed.
Pasztor pronounced optimism over the meetings held with the heads of the state and government in the past months by Ban Ki-moon but pointed out that commitments by national leaders to participate in the New York Summit had already surpassed the mark established by a similar gathering in 2007, which had included 82 leaders.The Summit would focus on areas: adaptation, greenhouse gas reduction targets by developed and developing countries, funding to support mitigation and adaptation and the Governance structures needed for an effective regime.No new financial commitments to support the efforts of developing countries are expected during the Summit, but it is hoped that there would be work on a new framework
The upcoming summit is the most significant for global issue of climate, since little is time left for Copenhagen – the climate treaty as a successor to Kyoto protocol and it is becoming hard for the nations to afford to bear deadlock upon deadlock over treaties related to the subject of climate change.
Many analyst believe, The Ice Age ended only 10,000 years ago, and the Little Ice Age - just a century ago. The temperatures are rising now because they were historically low 150 years ago. Ice caps are melting because they hugely increased since sixteenth century. Ice ages come and go in cycles, apparently
related to solar activity. Mechanisms are entirely unclear: for example, periods of low sunspots often surprisingly correlate with volcanic activity on Earth.
Current temperatures are historically low, and their increase is normal. What is the increase, anyway? The ecologists debated it at the conference. That’s right, the conclusions are based on debate; estimates ranged several times. Good for leftists, bad for scholars. Theories are expected to be proven with something more sound than vociferousness. So perhaps global temperatures will increase a few degrees over the century. I love warm weather. People in cold countries would enjoy the change. Africans, they are technologically unable sustain the exploding population whatever the climate.
Carbon dioxide increase coincided with industrialization. Cause-and- effect relationship is dubious. In warmer periods, carbon dioxide increases about 50% from the glacial levels. Current concentration is slightly above that norm, but the norm is average. Most likely, in some periods the average increase was greatly exceeded. On the geological time scale, the current carbon dioxide levels are very low.
Humans contribute hardly 3% to the natural output of carbon dioxide,at least half of which gets regenerated in plants and dissolved in oceans. To claim that a system so well balanced and adaptive as Earth could be destabilized by 1% change is preposterous.
Author:
Naresh Sagar
e-mail
Web: www.nksagar.com
Phone: 9810974027